Modular Service Splitting¶
Reject independently operated services when only naming and repository size suggest separation.
Generated example
This page is generated from evaluations/scenarios/modular-service-splitting.yaml. The scenario YAML remains the executable source of truth.
Request¶
Repository evidence¶
No repository signals.
Expected resolution¶
| Resolution layer | Expected |
|---|---|
| Profile | — |
| Modifiers | — |
| Language adapters | — |
| Framework adapters | — |
Normalized context¶
Skill modes¶
None.
Conflict decisions¶
None.
Significant decisions¶
None.
Principles under test¶
Forbidden outcomes¶
- Create one service per domain noun.
- Infer deployment boundaries from codebase size.
Scenario source¶
schema_version: 0.10.0
id: modular-service-splitting
description: Reject independently operated services when only naming and repository
size suggest separation.
input:
skill: modular-design
mode: service-oriented
task: Split a cohesive single-lifecycle module into services without isolation or
scaling evidence.
expected:
active_principles:
- high-cohesion-low-coupling
- information-hiding
constrained_principles:
- separation-of-concerns
suppressed_principles: []
forbidden:
- Create one service per domain noun.
- Infer deployment boundaries from codebase size.
principles_under_test:
- high-cohesion-low-coupling
- information-hiding
- separation-of-concerns
- avoid-accidental-complexity